<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing Shopping FAIL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slightlyinsightful.com/2009/08/28/bing-shopping-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slightlyinsightful.com/2009/08/28/bing-shopping-fail/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on life, technology, and doing more of the things that matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 03:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://slightlyinsightful.com/2009/08/28/bing-shopping-fail/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Merrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slightlyinsightful.com/?p=173#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Just trying to add a thought to this thoughtless article.&quot;

You failed, Aaron.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just trying to add a thought to this thoughtless article.&#8221;</p>
<p>You failed, Aaron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammon</title>
		<link>http://slightlyinsightful.com/2009/08/28/bing-shopping-fail/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ammon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slightlyinsightful.com/?p=173#comment-28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, that&#039;s quite a bit of negativity coming from you Aaron.  

While not perfect, if you look at the results from Google Shopping you&#039;ll at least get a Snow Leopard book within the top three results.  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/abeckstrom/3876244362/&quot; title=&quot;snow leopard - Google Product Search by abeckstrom, on Flickr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Bing didn&#039;t get anything related until the third page.  For Bing to be successful, it has to be a lot better than Google, not as good as them.  Otherwise no one will switch.

I&#039;m not a Bing hater, per se, I&#039;m more of a Bing agnostic.  This post came as a response of a friend prompting me to check out Bing Shopping.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s quite a bit of negativity coming from you Aaron.  </p>
<p>While not perfect, if you look at the results from Google Shopping you&#8217;ll at least get a Snow Leopard book within the top three results.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/abeckstrom/3876244362/" title="snow leopard - Google Product Search by abeckstrom, on Flickr" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
<p>Bing didn&#8217;t get anything related until the third page.  For Bing to be successful, it has to be a lot better than Google, not as good as them.  Otherwise no one will switch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Bing hater, per se, I&#8217;m more of a Bing agnostic.  This post came as a response of a friend prompting me to check out Bing Shopping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Lauper</title>
		<link>http://slightlyinsightful.com/2009/08/28/bing-shopping-fail/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Lauper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slightlyinsightful.com/?p=173#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad Reporting! 

Try &quot;snow leopard&quot; on google shopping and you won&#039;t find the product on their website either. http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=snow%20leopard&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wf

Try a little homework before bashing Microsoft - otherwise you come across as a lazy reporter who likes to take cheap shots with no insight.

What is more likely the problem here is that apple has not infused their online distribution channels with their product and product images with enough lead time to get into search engine shopping channels. As search engines are usually just crawling feeds for products and prices. 

Just trying to add a thought to this thoughtless article.

Aaron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad Reporting! </p>
<p>Try &#8220;snow leopard&#8221; on google shopping and you won&#8217;t find the product on their website either. <a href="http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&#038;source=hp&#038;q=snow%20leopard&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;tab=wf" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&#038;source=hp&#038;q=snow%20leopard&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;tab=wf</a></p>
<p>Try a little homework before bashing Microsoft &#8211; otherwise you come across as a lazy reporter who likes to take cheap shots with no insight.</p>
<p>What is more likely the problem here is that apple has not infused their online distribution channels with their product and product images with enough lead time to get into search engine shopping channels. As search engines are usually just crawling feeds for products and prices. </p>
<p>Just trying to add a thought to this thoughtless article.</p>
<p>Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

